EMC - EV

Electromagnetic Compatibility for Electric Vehicles

Compliance to CISPR-25 Conducted Emissions Voltage

When comes to achieving EMC compliance for automotive specs a 2-layer PCB works only for very simple designs. Modules having CAN/LIN, USB, E-Net, LVDS are normally using 4-layer PCBs. If adding CPU and memory a 4-layer PCB may not be good enough.

Ford (FMC) mentioned 20 years ago in their EMC design guide for 2-layer PCB to use the “Ground Grid Technique” for top and bottom side of PCB. They also recommended the use of "Faraday Cage" by installing ground vias around the perimeter of the PCB every say 15mm that are connected together on both PCB sides by 0.4 mm thick traces.

The problem with CE-V is that even using a “ground grid” or “faraday cage” won’t prevent DUT’s noise to be coupled into Supply Lines. Assuming that in your case CE-V are higher on GND line I would:

  1. determine potential sources of noise with harmonics in FM band
  2. determine the noise coupling method (e.g. common mode current, common return path, ground loops)
  3. Clamp ferrite corres on the entire test harness to lower CE-V noise below limit. Clamp the same ferrite separately on VBATT or GND line to determine which one is more affected. 

RF filters are effective for emissions exceeding the limit with 2-3 dB. For conducted emissions exceeding the limit with 10 dB you better try to fix the layout first.


Christian Rosu Feb 8, 2020.

CAN Bus Hardware Verification

CAN Bus Termination

The termination is used to match impedance of a node to the impedance of the transmission line being used. When impedance is mismatched, the transmitted signal is not completely absorbed by the load and a portion is reflected back into the  transmission line. If the source, transmission line and load impedance are equal these reflections are eliminated. This test measures the series resistance of the CAN data pair conductors and the attached terminating resistors.

1. Turn off all power supplies of the attached CAN nodes.

2. Measure the DC resistance between CAN_H and CAN_L at the middle and ends of the network.

The measured value should be between 50 and 70 Ω. The measured value should be nearly the same at each point of the network. If the value is below 50 Ω, please make sure that:

- there is no short circuit between CAN_H and CAN_L wiring

- there are not more than two terminating resistors

- the nodes do not have faulty transceivers.

If the value is higher than 70 Ω, please make sure that:

- there are no open circuits in CAN_H or CAN_L wiring

- your bus system has two terminating resistors (one at each end) and that they are 120 Ω each.

 

CAN_H/CAN_L Voltage Verification

Each node contains a CAN transceiver that outputs differential signals. When the network communication is idle the CAN_H and CAN_L voltages are approximately 2.5 volts. Faulty transceivers can cause the idle voltages to vary and disrupt network communication. To test for faulty transceivers, please

1. Turn on all supplies.

2. Stop all network communication.

3. Measure the DC voltage between CAN_H and GND

4. Measure the DC voltage between CAN_L and GND

Normally the voltage should be between 2.0 V and 4.0 V. If it is lower than 2.0 V or higher than 4.0 V, it is possible that one or more nodes have faulty transceivers. For a voltage lower than 2.0 V please check CAN_H and CAN_L conductors for continuity. For a voltage higher than 4.0 V, please check for excessive voltage.

 

CAN Bus Ground Verification

The shield of the CAN network has to be grounded at only one location. This test will indicate if the shielding is grounded in several places: 

1. Disconnect the shield wire (Shield) from the ground.

2. Measure the DC resistance between Shield and ground.

3. Connect Shield wire to ground.

 The resistance should be higher than 1 M Ω. If it is lower, please search for additional grounding of the shield wires.

 

CAN Transceiver Resistance Test

CAN transceivers have one circuit that controls CAN_H and another circuit that controls CAN_L. Experience has shown that electrical damage to one or both of the circuits may increase the leakage current in these circuits. To measure the current leakage through the CAN circuits, please use an resistance measuring device and:

1. Disconnect the node from the network. Leave the node unpowered.

2. Measure the DC resistance between CAN_H and CAN_GND.

3. Measure the DC resistance between CAN_L and CAN_GND.

Normally the resistance should be between 1 M Ω and 4 M Ω or higher. If it is lower than this range, the CAN transceiver is probably faulty.

CISPR-25 RE per CS.00054:2018

CISPR-25 Generic Test Setup for compliance to CS.00054:2018

CS.00054 Radiated Emissions Block Diagram

The vertical monopole element is centered at 1m from the center of the 1.7m test harness. Note that 1.5m of the harness is running at 10 cm parallel with ground plane edge. The antenna counterpoise is placed +10/-20 mm vs GP. 

CISPR-25 Generic DUT Setup. The DUT is placed @ 20 cm from the edge of GP. The 1.7 m Test Harness is routed 90 degrees towards DUT.

The ground plane is connected to chamber's floor to a dedicated Earth Grounding Rod.

LISN (700 V DC / 500 A) & Load Simulator side of the test setup. 
DUT's B+ & GND lines are connected to LISN's outputs.

THE BICONICAL ANTENNA IN VERTICAL POLARIZATION. 
The antenna is centered on the 1.5m harness running at 10 cm parallel with GP edge.

THE BICONICAL ANTENNA IN HORIZONTAL POLARIZATION. 
The antenna is centered on the 1.5m harness running at 10 cm parallel with GP edge.

THE LOG PERIODIC ANTENNA IN VERTICAL POLARIZATION. 
The tip of antenna is 1 m away from the center of the test harness.

THE LOG PERIODIC ANTENNA IN HORIZONTAL POLARIZATION. 
The tip of antenna is 1 m away from the center of the test harness.

Octave Antenna Vertical Polarization with its aperture centered on DUT at 1 m distance from test harness.

Octave Antenna Horizontal Polarization with its aperture centered on DUT at 1 m distance from test harness.

Horn Antenna Horizontal Polarization with its aperture centered on DUT at 1 m distance from test harness.

Horn Antenna Vertical Polarization with its aperture centered on DUT at 1 m distance from test harness.

3-METER ALSE CHAMBER & Equipment Control Shielded Room.
 
ALSE CHAMBER EARTH GROUNDING ROD.

RI 115 "ALSE chamber open door" test configuration

A few months ago I was surprised that UL lab (Novi, MI) runs RI 115 (Immunity to Hand Portable Transmitters) leaving the ALSE chamber door fully open. I have requested the test engineer to confirm that he follows correctly UL lab internal test procedure. The response was that this is practically near field RF immunity, therefore there is no concern to interfere with other lab test equipment.


This is completely false, the reason for closing ALSE chamber door during RF immunity is to evaluate the DUT performance in a noise free environment with minimum of reflections from the chamber's walls. By opening ALSE chamber door RF emissions from nearby test equipment, broadcast and mobile services may be reflected from walls affecting DUT performance simultaneously with the intended RF near field.

I would be very curious to understand how was possible for A2LA to certify such test setup. Is this "open door" RI 115 configuration acceptable for Ford?



CISPR-25 RF emissions ambient test pitfalls

CISPR-25 is not very specific about device under test and support equipment configuration during chamber ambient test. The automotive OEM require the ambient for RE, CE-V, CE-I with support equipment energized. The test laboratories will typically disconnect VBATT line from LISN output. The GND line remains connected to LISN. By doing so is assumed that DUT is not energized. The support equipment remains connected to the input of the LISNs being turned on (energized). The CAN bus is powered but w/o traffic. It is unclear if the load simulator energized it means powered but inactive (standby). By activating PWM pulses as inputs for DUT it may yield unwanted CE-I and RE ambient noise. All these aspects must be clarified in the EMC test plan.

In the sample presented the CE-V ambient noise is well below the 6 dB requirement. However, this type of noise is being captured while DUT's integrated buttons are being pressed and released via a pneumatic system with no electrical connection to DUT or test ground plane. Specifying that DUT must be unpowered may not be enough, the DUT's buttons should not be mechanically activated, nor its inputs subjected to electrical signals.


Christian Rosu

RI 115 copy and paste fake report

The automotive OEM that certifies EMC laboratories to carry out validation testing invested a lot of trust in accuracy and correctness of so called "sign-off" reports. This "sign-off test results"  or "not for sign-off test results" statement maybe an excuse for skipping a full review if the summary looks clean.

The automotive electronic device supplier must always verify in detail the report to clarify each reported non-conformance. Otherwise it may adversely affect the entire validation process through endless testing to fix potential false issues.

The sample of bad report shown below may easily go undetected by those searching for easy resolutions (pass / fail). 

Page #6 vs Page #18

In tis particular case two samples (7000 & 7002) are being evaluated for near filed interferences from portable transmitters.

The requirement for DUT in question is to pass Level 1 in band#9 (no deviation allowed under 7 Watts). The testing is carried out at 14 Watts, which is the Level 2 Severity. Whenever a deviation occurs the test operator must threshold the lowest severity level where the problem goes away.

The issue with the above result is that the same severity level threshold result was copied from one sample to another (7002 to 7000). It is impossible to have identical 3-digit accuracy readings between two test samples for the same antenna position and orientation. In fact, considering the uncertainty of test equipment combined with HW/SW tolerances of DUT it is impossible if scanning the same sample twice. The test result data file is generated automatically by the software running the test equipment. Chances to be a copy and paste mistake are zero.
Page #7 vs Page #24

Looking over page's date/time the scan below was generated before the scan above. However the order of pages is as was listed in the full report.

Page #9 vs Page #21
The test operator was in rush missing to change the test sample number from 7002 to 7000. Page #9 was supposed to show results from sample #7000. For the failed frequency step (850 MHz) the test operator slightly changed the Level 1 threshold value on the second tested sample (from 6.058 to 6.15 Watts) leaving unchanged the level 2 threshold values for all other  frequencies. Looking closely to date/time stamps they also are identical on both pages. Is this a honest mistake? 

This kind of precision in measurements would humiliate any theory so far.

Page #11 vs Page #23

The perfect DUT type ever, perfect RI 115 equipment, perfect test operator, perfect identical hand portable transmitters immunity!

Going over pages's date/time they both have the same stamp. Theb why inserting them such that they apear to belong to separate test samples?

Page #12 vs Page #19

Surprisingly, but there is an antenna position where the result was either correctly tested or correctly represented.

This was the only instance where the RI 115 result from one sample was not copied over the for the other sample.

Page #13 vs Page #25

The RI 115 make up report saga continues. As long as the customer is preoccupied by the deviation in Level 1 it will never pay attention that only one sample was fully tested. The really bad part is that the designer will believe there is some sort of stability in DUT's behavior when in fact it was a huge instability.

Again same date/time stamp but different test sample numbers. How was this possible?



Christian Rosu

Trialon EMC Laboratory, Burton, MI

Igor Klivak

EMC-CS-2009.1 CI 210 (Us Vp-p calibration issue)

ES-XW7T-1A278-AC Immunity from Continuous Disturbances: CI 210

This test refers to continuous disturbances produced by vehicle’s charging system that can affect DUT functions.



FMC1278 Rev2 vs EMC-CS-2009.1 - CI 210 Requirements

  • Level 2 requirements, as delineated in ES-XW7T-1A278-AC was removed in EMC-CS-2009.1, then added back in FMC1278.
  • The frequency range allocated for severity levels was changed subsequently in all three Ford EMC specifications.
  • The most significant differences for Us Vp-p requirements occurred between  ES-XW7T-1A278-AC & EMC-CS-2009.1.


CI 210 Frequency Steps

The most significant differences in frequency steps requirements occurred between  ES-XW7T-1A278-AC & EMC-CS-2009.1.


ES-XW7T-1A278-AC CI 210: Test Setup
  • The test harness connecting the DUT to the Test Fixture and transient pulse generator shall be < 2000 mm in length.
  • The DUT and wire harness shall be placed on an insulated support 50 mm above the ground plane. If the outer case of the DUT is metal and can be grounded when installed in the vehicle, the DUT shall be mounted and electrically connected to the ground plane.

ES-XW7T-1A278-AC CI 210: Test Procedure

  1. Adjust DC offset of the signal generator/audio amplifier to 13.5 volts with the DUT disconnected (open circuit)
  2. At each test frequency set and record the signal generator output to the specified voltage level with the DUT disconnected (open circuit).
  3. Without the test signal present, connect the DUT and verify that it is functioning correctly.
  4. Apply the test signal to the DUT and the Test Fixture such that all power and control circuits are exposed to the disturbance. All power and control circuits are tested simultaneously.
EMC-CS-2009.1 CI 210: Test Setup

  • The test harness connecting the DUT to the Load Simulator and modulated DC supply shall be < 2000 mm in length.
  • All DUT power/power return circuits shall be connected together at the modulated power supply.
  • Per previous versions of this requirement, a ground plane may be placed under the DUT and Load Simulator, but if used, the DUT and wire harness shall be placed on an insulated support 50mm above the ground  plane. Additionally, the negative connection of the modulated DC supply and case of the Load Simulator shall be referenced to the ground plane.


EMC-CS-2009.1 CI 210: Test Procedure

  1. Without the DUT connected, adjust the DC voltage offset "Up" of the modulated power supply to 13.5 volts. Initially set the AC voltage amplitude "Us" to zero volts.
  2. Connect and activate the DUT and verify it is functioning correctly. Verify that Up remains at 13.5 VDC. Adjust the supply as required to achieve this voltage level.
  3. At each test frequency increase Us to the corresponding stress level while the DUT is operating. The dwell time shall be at least 2 seconds. A longer dwell time may be necessary if DUT function response times are expected to be longer. This information shall be documented in the EMC test plan.
FMC1278 CI 210: Test Setup

  • The test harness connecting the DUT to the Load Simulator and modulated DC supply shall be < 2000 mm in length.
  • All DUT power/power return circuits shall be connected together at the modulated power supply.



FMC1278 CI 210: Test Procedure

  1. Without the DUT connected, adjust the DC voltage offset "Up" of the modulated power supply to DUT’s system voltage (13.5, 27 volts). “Us” is initially set to zero volts.
  2. At each test frequency adjust and record the signal generator output required to achieve the specified modulation voltage level “Us” with the DUT disconnected (open circuit). Use the frequency steps listed.
  3. Without the modulation signal present (i.e. Us = 0 volts), connect the DUT and verify it is functioning correctly.
  4. At each test frequency, apply the signal generator levels recorded in step (2) to the DUT and the Load Simulator such that all power and control circuits are exposed to the disturbance. The dwell time shall be at least 2 seconds. A longer dwell time may be necessary if DUT function response times are expected to be longer. This information shall be documented in the EMC test plan and test report.
Fixing EMC-CS-2009.1 CI 210 Us (Vp-p) calibration issue:

CI 210 test waveform is not the superimposed alternating voltage per ISO 16750-2. 
Prior to test Us is calibrated (substitution method) to maintain the required Us V(p-p) while DUT is driving high current loads (e.g. 30A): at each test frequency increase Us to the corresponding stress level while the DUT is operating. The amplifier (e.g. Techron 7796) is configured to operate as Voltage-Controlled Source. Whenever functions are paused between activations (very low current) the amplifier will increase its output voltage in an attempt to drive the requested current into DUT as recorded during Us (Vp-p) calibration. This will result in high voltage (e.g. above 40V) being present for long enough time at DUT VBATT input that can damage components.

The solution is to run CI 210 per FMC1278 that has corrected the test procedure: at each test frequency adjust and record the signal generator output required to achieve the specified modulation voltage level “Us” with the DUT disconnected (open circuit).


Christin Rosu

Automotive Centralized Load Dump Test Requirements

Types of load dump transient generators

The high energy content of load dump pulse require specialized pulse generators like classic LCR or DC amplifier based pulse generators.

The LD pulse width and amplitude decrease the smaller the connected load gets. Such requirement can only be fulfilled by using a generator using an energy storage capacitor and a passive pulse-forming network.
Using a programmable DC amplifier to generate LD then pulse amplitude can be set correctly but can't adjust the pulse duration. The DC amplifier based generator outputs considerably more energy being applied to the DUT, which increases the chances to see DUT false deviations.
Curve #1 is unsuppressed LD using generator per ISO 7637-2:2004 Annex E (energy capacitor based LD generator)
Curve #2 is unsuppressed LD using DC amplifier
Curve #3 is suppressed LD using generator per ISO 7637-2:2004 Annex E (energy capacitor based LD generator)
Curve #4 is suppressed LD using DC amplifier
The white area shows the energy absorbed by a varistor or TVS representing the input protection of the DUT.
The grey areas indicate the energy that the DUT is actually exposed to during this test.
The sample above shows 70% higher energy being applied to the DUT by an amplifier based generator compared to the energy generated by an energy capacitor based generator.

ISO 7637-2:2004 ANNEX-E (Recommended Pulse Generator Type)
E.1 Determination and verification of pulse generator minimum energy capability
E.1.1 Calculation method

This method is used to calculate the energy of the pulse as delivered by the generator to the matching resistor (resistive load RL ), utilizing the measured pulse parameters td and Us.
The transient generator used shall generate double exponential transients, which are a result of capacitive discharges into a pulse shaping network. This type of generator is applicable to pulses 1 (12 V), 1 (24 V), 2a, 3a/3b and 5.

Alternator Load Dump Suppressor
During the LOAD DUMP the difference between two phases reaches up the breakdown voltage of the diodes and then they act as clamping parts. As the difference of potential between each phase is alternative then D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6 act in clamping mode as well as in forward bias.


Centralized Load Dump Suppression
The vehicle central transient suppression device is connected directly across the main power supply w/o load resistance. It must absorb the entire load dump energy, and also withstand the full jump-start voltage. It is usually located in the most critical electronic module, however additional suppressors may be placed on other modules to further suppression and to control locally-generated transients.

SAE J1113-11 (2007)
The Load Dump Pulse Suppressed or Unsuppressed  is defined regardless to specification used by (Us) Peak Voltage in Volts, (Ri) Internal Resistance in ohms, and (td) Duration in ms.



The precise characteristics of suppressed load dump pulse varies based on automotive OEM type of centralized LD suppressor used. The testing methodology is periodically adjusted to accommodate new type of electronic devices. As of today most OEM specifications tend to relay on ISO 16750 for Load Dump.

GM9105P Pulse#6 (LD)


GMW3097(2015)
For pulse 5b, use 2 Ω as the source resistance (Ri) per ISO 16750-2. (Us = 34 V +0/-1 V)

Load Dump Vehicle Suppression Model (PF9326E)
Case #1
  • DUT that operate in a vehicle using avalanche/zener diodes in the alternator for LD protection
    • suppressed LD must be clamped to the avalanche diode clamp level.
  • DUT that provide vehicle LD protection must be tested to verify
    • the peak current sinking capability
    • the clamping voltage under load
  • DUT expected to sink greater than 40 amps peak current (e.g., engine controller)
    • tested with an additional 1 ohm of resistance in series with the simulator.
  • DUT expected to sink greater than 25 amps peak current (e.g.,airbag control module)
    • tested with an additional 2 ohms of resistance in series with the simulator.
  • For both cases
    • the clamping voltage under load, across the DUT, must be less than 40 volts
  • For all other DUT
    • open circuit pulse is clamped to an equivalent vehicle system level (40 V maximum, ramping to 35 V max at 100 ms and 25 V max at 200 ms) by connecting a vehicle suppression model in parallel across the load dump output
Case #2
  • LD protection in a (single) centralized location
    • The engine controller, airbag control module or other modules are not expected to sink load dump current.
  • DUT that provide a centralized load dump clamp (e.g. zener protected power distribution center or PDC)
    •  tested with the full simulator output with no additional series resistance.
  • For all other DUT
    • this open circuit pulse is to be clamped to an equivalent vehicle with simulated avalanche/zener diode suppression in the alternator system level (36 V maximum) by connecting an alternator simulator suppression model in parallel across the load dump output.
Case #3
  • Alternator avalanche/zenner diode load dump protection
    • LD test pulse applied to the DUT must be clamped to the avalanche/zener diode clamp level (32 V maximum) by an alternator equivalent suppression model.
Test Pulse #5B as delineated in LP-388C-36
  • The suppression network shall be connected to the load dump simulator with a wire length of 20cm and in parallel with the DUT.
  • Test all DUT supply terminals together.
  • Leads to be load dumped include the following: battery, ignition and any other input and/or output sourced from battery or ignition voltage as configured in a DUT's complete vehicle system.
  • Isolate any exerciser circuits, which are meant to simulate other electronic module peripherals to the DUT.
  • Do not apply the transient to support equipment.
  • The DUT supply voltage shall be provided through the load dump simulator, while the DUT exerciser shall be powered from a separate supply. The negative terminal for the two power supplies shall be connected together.
Suppression Module Verification
  • Before the test, the Suppression Module must be verified with 13.5 dc volts offset.
  • The output waveform is evaluated using the specifications defined in PF-9326.
  • The results of both open and loaded measurements must be documented.

Load Dump Simulator Impedance Verification
The load dump waveform shall be verified with the output open-circuited and shall be evaluated using the specifications defined in PF-9326. Verify that the effect is not caused by the transient interfering with the DUT support equipment. If there is suspicion that the load dump is interfering directly with components of the DUT exerciser, measure the pulse amplitude appearing at the input to the exerciser component which is not meant to be tested. If a substantial amplitude is present, investigate by removing such components.



ES-XW7T-1A278-AB CI 240
A load dump typically occurs during a vehicle-to-vehicle jump start when the jumping vehicle can experience a significant load dump or due to a loose battery terminal. It represents sudden disconnection of load from alternator. Max voltage ESC is exposed to is about 45 V.
  • Open Circuit: Vbat+ 60V, 300 ms
  • Loaded Circuit: (R = 0.7W): Vbat+30 V, 150 ms


EMC-CS-2009.1 CI 220 Pulse G2 (Centralized Load Dump)
Practically the same CLDS suggested by SAE J1113-11.


FMC1278 Rev 2 CI 222 (Suppressed Load Dump Pulse 5b )



DUT Load Dump Protection using TVS Diodes
1. Darlington LD Suppression Circuit for low current consumption devices



2. P-FET LD Suppression Circuit



3. P-FET LD Suppression with Isolation Switch Circuit



Summary
1) TVS Diodes are used to protect DUT from various supply line transients


2) For vehicle having centralized load dump protection the test pulse used is ISO 7637-2:2004 (ISO 16750) 5b.
3) Avalanche diodes or Zener diodes are used in alternators to suppress the load dump to a voltage defined by automotive OEM.



References:
Load Dump Phenomenon by Roland Spriessler & Markus Fuhrer
Various Electronic Components Automotive OEM EMC Specs
Updated on Apr 17, 2017 by Christian Rosu


Shielding Effectiveness

The generic shielding effectiveness requirement is 40 dB for magnetic field, electric field, and plane waves. Depending on the application the frequency range can start from 10 Hz going up to GHz.

To predict shielding effectiveness (SE) of a metal sheet the following factors are summed:  Absorption Loss (A), Reflection Loss (R), re-Reflection Correction Factor (C).  SE = A + R – C (see MIL-HDBK-419A).












Absorption loss depends on material thickness, permeability, electrical conductivity, and the frequency of the incident wave.  It is the same for all electromagnetic waves.

Reflection loss depends on the distance of the EMI source to the material (different for electric, magnetic, and plane waves), material electrical conductivity, and the frequency of the incident wave.

Sources:
Christian Rosu